Simultaneous Calibration and Nonresponse Adjustment
نویسندگان
چکیده
Single and joint inclusion probabilities are generally available and known for complex survey designs up to the point where survey weights are modified due to nonresponse and population controls. Best practice by sophisticated survey practitioners generally includes weight modifications, first by calibration, ratio adjustment or raking to correct for nonresponse, next by further steps to impose population survey controls; and also, often, by final steps involving weight truncation or cell-collapsing to constrain the modified weights, usually so that the largest and smallest weights do not differ by more than a designated multiplicative factor. These adjustments are sometimes made in successive stages, the order of which may differ from one survey to another. In this article, generalized-raking calibration methodology is adapted to allow all of these adjustments, and possibly additional nonlinear constraints, to be accomplished in a single stage, after which linearization-based large-sample variance formulas are available. This report is released to inform interested parties of ongoing research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed on statistical methodological issues are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the U.S. Census Bureau.
منابع مشابه
Latent Variable Models for Nonresponse Adjustment and Calibration
Traditional weight adjustments for survey sampling error are often constructed through multiple stages, where design weights are based on the inverse of the probability of selection, and in a separate stage nonresponse adjustments are derived from weighting cells or classes, or based on model-deduced response propensities. More recent efforts by Little and Vartivarian (2003) have advocated the ...
متن کاملImproved Sampling Weight Calibration by Generalized Raking with Optimal Unbiased Modification
Traditional methods for sampling weight adjustment involve weighting class adjustment for nonresponse bias reduction, followed by post-stratification (raking-ratio or regression) adjustment for coverage bias reduction, and then trimming (or winsorization) of extreme weights for variance reduction followed by final post-stratification to meet desired control totals and for further variance reduc...
متن کاملProviding double protection for unit nonresponse with a nonlinear calibration-weighting routine
Given a randomly drawn sample, calibration weighting can provide double protection against the selection bias resulting from unit nonresponse. This means that if either an assumed linear prediction model or an implied unit selection model holds, the resulting estimator will be asymptotically unbiased in some sense. The functional form of the selection model when using linear calibration adjustm...
متن کاملPropensity score adjustment with several followups
Abstract Propensity score weighting adjustment is commonly used to handle unit nonresponse. When the response mechanism is nonignorable in the sense that the response probability depends directly on the study variable, a followup sample is commonly used to obtain an unbiased estimator using the framework of two-phase sampling, where the follow-up sample is assumed to respond completely. In prac...
متن کاملParadata for Nonresponse Adjustment
Survey researchers and practitioners use nonresponse adjustment weights to mitigate the effects of survey nonresponse on sample estimates. One challenge in creating these weights is finding useful auxiliary data that predict both the probability of participating in the survey and the survey variables of interest. This article reviews the use of paradata for nonresponse adjustment. Five differen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009